Skip to content

Regulated AI Navigator

Turn an AI use case into its full regulatory footprint — every domain it touches, from AI law and data protection to cyber, product safety and sector rules — with the obligations, the architecture and the evidence you owe, in about two minutes.

Community-curated knowledge graph — every claim carries its citation across law, engineering and governance. Every change traceable →

Start where you stand →Browse 45 profiles

Where do you stand? › Prove it · Test plan

Test Plan Generator

A knowledge graph can derive tests a developer would not write, because the scenarios come from the obligations, the threat model and the differences between your target markets — not from the code. State the system and its design; the generator produces scenarios with steps, expected outcomes, a traceability matrix from duty to test to evidence artifact, and a coverage statement that names what it could not derive.

Runs entirely in your browser — the description, any uploaded document and the design you state are never uploaded or stored on our side.

1 · The system under test

Or upload a documentPDF, DOCX, TXT or MD — project sketch, tender document, architecture memo. Read in your browser only.
Plan title (optional)
Target market(s)

Where will this system be used or placed on the market? The conclusion is derived for these jurisdictions — instruments that bind only elsewhere are left out.

Europe
North America
Latin America
Asia-Pacific
Middle East
Africa

Selected: European Union, United States (federal) · thin-coverage jurisdictions need verification

2 · The design, as your team states it

These answers decide which tests are derived and whether each one is marked “verify what exists” or “build, then test”. They are statements by you, not findings about your system.

Model type
Where the decision is made
Human review today
Interfaces
What is logged today
Data in the decision path
Decision owner (role or team)
Data sources — one per line
Notes for the plan (optional)

Indicative decision support, not legal advice. Risk classification depends on your concrete deployment context and can change with scope drift — validate the result with qualified counsel.