Skip to content

Regulated AI Navigator

Turn an AI use case into its full regulatory footprint — every domain it touches, from AI law and data protection to cyber, product safety and sector rules — with the obligations, the architecture and the evidence you owe, in about two minutes.

Community-curated knowledge graph — every claim carries its citation across law, engineering and governance. Every change traceable →

Start where you stand →Browse 45 profiles

Where do you stand? › Route 4 · Stack first

My stack is fixed — what can I run on it?

The inverse traversal. Tell the graph what you already run, and it ranks all use-case profiles by how much of their required technical control set you already cover — an opportunity view, not only an obligation view. Nothing is stored.

Target market(s)European UnionUnited States (federal)change

Highest-leverage gaps are flagged when the missing component is a jurisdiction-specific legal driver outside your selected markets.

Target market(s)

Where will this system be used or placed on the market? The conclusion is derived for these jurisdictions — instruments that bind only elsewhere are left out.

Europe
North America
Latin America
Asia-Pacific
Middle East
Africa

Selected: European Union, United States (federal) · thin-coverage jurisdictions need verification

Step 1 of 2 — what do you already run?0 selected

Nothing selected yet — pick the components your platform already provides.
Two-Tier Air-Gapped De-Identification Ingestion (3)
Deterministic Circuit Breaker with Reversible Shadow Execution (3)
Grounded Citational RAG (5)
Deterministic Document-Validation Pipeline (3)
Dual-Agent Guardian Topology (4)
Hardened Edge / IoT Pattern (3)
Constrained GAM with Differential-Privacy Tokenisation (2)
Glass-Box EBM with Monotonic Constraints (2)
Guarded RAG Pattern (2)
Human-in-the-Loop Core Pattern (1)
Tiered-Confidence Moderation Queue (1)
Agentic RDA Stack (6 Layers) (3)
Sandboxed Execution with SAST Gates (1)
Sovereign Resilient Enterprise Pattern (5)
Four-Layer TRiSM Enterprise Stack (2)
Cross-cutting components (16)

Step 2 of 2 — what your stack enables

What coverage means here: a use case is covered when every control it requires maps to at least one component in your stack. A gap is therefore not a score — it is a specific missing edge in the graph, named below with the control it would satisfy.

No components selected — pick what you run above and the 44 use-case profiles will re-rank instantly.