Turn an AI use case into its EU AI Act risk class, the regulations it triggers, the obligations, the architecture and the evidence you owe — in about two minutes.
Community-curated knowledge graph, peer-reviewed by experts across law, engineering and governance. Every change traceable →
The business-risk perspective pure compliance review lacks: priority score, compliance cost bands, 3-year ROAI and an explicit verdict. Five-step evaluation pipeline — every threshold, band and formula is read from the knowledge graph (meta.evaluator, v2.1.2) — community-disputable, not hardcoded.
Step 0 — Describe or upload the use case
Service-as-a-Software examples:
Step 1 — Inventory & assumptions
Art. 6(3) derogation criteria (multi):
Step 2 — Regulatory triage
Estimated class: Limited Risk (Transparency)
Effective class after triage: Limited Risk (Transparency)
3-year ROAI: gross annual benefit and recurring annual cost are both discounted at the configured rate for years 1-3; the initial cost (plus regulatory rework reserve) is booked undiscounted at t0.
FAST-TRACK DEPLOYMENT
Automated audit-as-code checks, baseline IT/privacy policy, no extra governance gates. Write down kill criteria anyway.
Indicative decision support, not legal advice. Risk classification depends on your concrete deployment context and can change with scope drift — validate the result with qualified counsel.
Indicative decision support, not legal advice. Risk classification depends on your concrete deployment context and can change with scope drift — validate the result with qualified counsel.