Regulated AI Navigator

Turn an AI use case into its EU AI Act risk class, the regulations it triggers, the obligations, the architecture and the evidence you owe — in about two minutes.

Community-curated knowledge graph, peer-reviewed by experts across law, engineering and governance. Every change traceable →

Analyse a use case →Browse 35 profiles

Regulation coverage

Every regulation in the graph resolves into concrete technical components — through an article obligation, a control objective, a design pattern or an evidence artefact that a component must produce. Pick a regulation to see its technical surface, how each component is derived, and in which of the triggering use cases it is actually part of the required stack. The gap counts show where the graph reaches a component that no use case yet requires — those are open contribution targets, not settled answers. Open the full graph →

ePrivacy Directive

source EUR-Lex

Confidentiality of communications, cookies/tracking — relevant for conversational interfaces and communications data.

12 components0 articles / obligations3 triggering use casesopen in graph

Input Rails / Prompt Shields

100% of use cases

Pre-model validation of user input: injection detection, topic blocking, encoding checks.

  • practice-derived3 triggering use cases require Input Rails / Prompt Shields

Output Rails / Groundedness Check

100% of use cases

Faithfulness scoring of answers against retrieved sources; deterministic fallback instead of hallucination; schema-validated structured output.

  • practice-derived3 triggering use cases require Output Rails / Groundedness Check

Retrieval Rails (ACL-aware RAG)

100% of use cases

Relevance, freshness and per-user permission checks on every retrieved chunk; curated, versioned index.

  • practice-derived3 triggering use cases require Retrieval Rails (ACL-aware RAG)

Synthetic-Content Labelling / Watermarking

100% of use cases

Synthetic-content labelling & watermarking: visible disclosure plus machine-readable provenance (C2PA Content Credentials) embedded in generated images, audio and video; metadata identifying artificial origin survives common transformations. Discharges Art. 50(2)/(4) for deepfakes and synthetic media; verification telemetry (watermark presence/validity checks at publication gates) is the corresponding evidence stream.

  • practice-derived3 triggering use cases require Synthetic-Content Labelling / Watermarking

Confidence Scoring & Threshold Gate

33% of use cases

Computes a probabilistic confidence score for every output and holds the transaction when the score falls below the workflow's regulatory threshold.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Confidence Scoring & Threshold Gate

Conversational Care Engine

33% of use cases

Omnichannel voice/chat agent runtime with knowledge grounding, AI-disclosure prompts, consent handling and transcript capture.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Conversational Care Engine

HITL Escalation Queue & Review UI

33% of use cases

HITL escalation queue & review UI ('Human-as-a-Tool': the agent calls the human like any other tool via propose-action objects). Confidence- and risk-threshold routing, SLA timers, structured accept/modify/reject verdicts with digital reviewer signature at gate release — each verdict is itself Art. 14 evidence and feeds the active-learning loop.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require HITL Escalation Queue & Review UI

Kill Switch / Graceful Degradation

33% of use cases

Operator stop controls and degraded-mode fallbacks; real-time override (veto) channels for HOTL operation.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Kill Switch / Graceful Degradation

Model Drift & Accuracy Monitor

33% of use cases

Continuous evaluation against golden sets and sampled human verdicts; raises drift alerts and feeds the recertification cycle.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Model Drift & Accuracy Monitor

Multi-Model Orchestration Layer

33% of use cases

Vendor-neutral abstraction over 20+ foundation models across text, vision, audio and code; decouples application logic from any single provider's availability, pricing or deprecation cycle.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Multi-Model Orchestration Layer

Multi-Model Router & Fallback Abstraction

33% of use cases

Abstraction layer decoupling application logic from model providers: dynamic routing on capability, cost, latency SLA and regulatory constraint (sensitive-data classes pinned to ZDR private/VPC endpoints or on-prem open-weight instances); real-time health monitoring with automatic fallback to secondary endpoints or local fine-tuned models on outage/latency spikes. Discharges resilience duties (DORA-class), prevents provider lock-in, and makes model deprecations a routing-table change instead of a re-architecture. Router decisions are logged into the decision trace — model version per event is an audit-packet field.

  • practice-derived1 triggering use case require Multi-Model Router & Fallback Abstraction