Regulated AI Navigator

Turn an AI use case into its EU AI Act risk class, the regulations it triggers, the obligations, the architecture and the evidence you owe — in about two minutes.

Community-curated knowledge graph, peer-reviewed by experts across law, engineering and governance. Every change traceable →

Analyse a use case →Browse 35 profiles

Regulation coverage

Every regulation in the graph resolves into concrete technical components — through an article obligation, a control objective, a design pattern or an evidence artefact that a component must produce. Pick a regulation to see its technical surface, how each component is derived, and in which of the triggering use cases it is actually part of the required stack. The gap counts show where the graph reaches a component that no use case yet requires — those are open contribution targets, not settled answers. Open the full graph →

CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence)

source EUR-Lex

Risk-based human-rights and environmental due diligence across the chain of activities: supplier screening, remediation and documented assessment cycles.

1 components0 articles / obligations2 triggering use casesopen in graph

Live Risk Register / Posture Management

50% of use cases

Continuously updated risk register wired to runtime posture: threat-model deltas, open defects, control status, exposure per system. Includes Shadow-AI discovery — continuous scanning for unsanctioned agents, MCP servers and AI API usage outside the register; an unregistered agent is an unmanaged Art. 12/26 liability and the empirical driver of proportionate (not blanket) controls.

  • named in regulationCSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence) → Live Risk Register / Posture Managementdocumented due-diligence cycle
Required inSupplier Master Data & ESG Risk Screening
Triggered but not yet requiredProcurement Variance & Vendor KPI Monitoring
✓ Confirm✗ Dispute+ Add sourceSign in to validate — every vote requires a source